Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: limit issue, i think it's a bug

November 26, 2011 08:22AM
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 5:03 AM, talisto <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote:
> I realize this is a two-year-old topic, but I'm having the same issue.
> It doesn't matter what I have the rate set to, it only allows about 2
> requests per second.  This is my config:
>
> in http:
> limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=flood:10m rate=15r/s;
>
> in server location:
> limit_req zone=flood;
>
> That should really be all that is necessary, right?  I'm using Nginx
> 1.1.6.
>

> Maxim Dounin Wrote:
> How do you test it?

> I've been testing it with Siege, but I can actually generate error 503
> responses just by refreshing my web browser fast enough. My results
> with Siege are somewhat random; sometimes the very first request fails,
> then a couple will pass, then another will fail, all within a couple
> seconds. That's with my rate set to 15r/s, which should be more than
> enough.. in Siege I'm only using 5 concurrent users with 1 request per
> second, yet it still fails, often on the first or second hit. In my
> browser, it's a bit more reliable; I have a simple page which makes 2
> ajax requests; the 2nd ajax request will always fail.

> As soon as I remove the limit_req line, I can flood my server with as
> many requests as Siege can handle and it never generates a 503, so I
> know that the errors aren't being caused by something else. I'm not
> sure why the limit_req isn't working properly though.

You are truncating your response. Don't top post or do that, it makes
it difficult to track things or for us to help you.

From a review of the documentation this is by design.
Siege with 5 concurrent users at 1r/s could easily exceed 15r/s if
there is other traffic or if it is not behaving predictably.
Are you sure there are no other requests to the site, and that the
browser test only makes 2 requests, and that siege only sends 10
requests? We need logs.
From what you have sent, you will get 503 because you are limiting the
requests and have not defined burst. Set burst to nodelay and see if
it allows 15/s.
And you cannot claim bug without evidence; please see the DEBUG
README, show relevant configuration, define limit_req_log_level
correctly, and send the output.


Stefan Caunter
http://scaleengine.com/contact
"People who enjoy having meetings should never be allowed to be in
charge of anything."

_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Subject Author Posted

limit issue, i think it's a bug

websun November 26, 2009 03:23AM

Re: limit issue, i think it's a bug

talisto November 26, 2011 05:03AM

Re: limit issue, i think it's a bug

Maxim Dounin November 26, 2011 05:40AM

Re: limit issue, i think it's a bug

talisto November 26, 2011 07:22AM

Re: limit issue, i think it's a bug

Maxim Dounin November 26, 2011 03:30PM

Re: limit issue, i think it's a bug

stefancaunter November 26, 2011 08:22AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 198
Record Number of Users: 8 on April 13, 2023
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready