On 9/01/2014 11:47 PM, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> On 9 January 2014 12:24, nano <nanotek@bsdbox.co> wrote:
>> I share your opinion regarding nginx documentation. It is woeful.
>
> Sorry chap - I didn't say that and I don't think that. There may well
> be some specific target audiences not well served by the aggregate of
> the current (psuedo-)documentation sources, but that doesn't mean they
> themselves are /that/ bad. My problems with them are specific and
> fixable, and not just "make it better!"
>
> J
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>

Nonetheless, I find the official documentation lacking. It is good that
you do not. Fortunately, there are alternative resources that make
deployment of nginx servers achievable for users lacking technical
proficiency, like myself.

--
syn.bsdbox.co

_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx