On 9 January 2014 12:24, nano <nanotek@bsdbox.co> wrote:
> I share your opinion regarding nginx documentation. It is woeful.

Sorry chap - I didn't say that and I don't think that. There may well
be some specific target audiences not well served by the aggregate of
the current (psuedo-)documentation sources, but that doesn't mean they
themselves are /that/ bad. My problems with them are specific and
fixable, and not just "make it better!"

J

_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx