Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Proxy_cache or direct static files ?

Maxim Dounin
December 19, 2013 10:22AM
Hello!

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:48:45AM -0500, Larry wrote:

> Ok,
>
> Now I get it right :)
>
> @Maxim : when you say faster memory storage, doesn't nginx get the result
> cached by the os itself ? And so in the ram ?
>
> What could be faster than that ?

Consider you have 100T of data on rotating disks, 32G of memory,
and 256G of SSD available. In such a case, using SSD for a cache
may be beneficial - not because something is faster than RAM, but
because you don't have enough RAM to cache everything.

--
Maxim Dounin
http://nginx.org/

_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Subject Author Posted

Proxy_cache or direct static files ?

Larry December 15, 2013 05:01AM

Re: Proxy_cache or direct static files ?

Larry December 16, 2013 05:47AM

Re: Proxy_cache or direct static files ?

Maxim Dounin December 18, 2013 07:44AM

Re: Proxy_cache or direct static files ?

Jonathan Matthews December 18, 2013 07:50AM

Re: Proxy_cache or direct static files ?

Larry December 19, 2013 09:48AM

Re: Proxy_cache or direct static files ?

Maxim Dounin December 19, 2013 10:22AM

Re: Proxy_cache or direct static files ?

Larry December 21, 2013 01:59AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 125
Record Number of Users: 8 on April 13, 2023
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready