Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Good Directive vs Bad Directives

May 01, 2012 09:48PM
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 18:34 -0700, antituhan wrote:
> Hi Francis, thanks for the response,
>
> Ok, basicly it's just a different directive (simple and 'crowded'
> directive), isn't it ? And it doesn't matter with cpu/mem load (such as we
> simply could use "try_files" than "if"). So, the conclusion is that "if"
> directive is same as "try_files", the different is only on the simplicity,
> and it's not causing cpu/mem high load, right?

http://wiki.nginx.org/IfIsEvil

Cliff

_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Subject Author Posted

Good Directive vs Bad Directives

antituhan April 24, 2012 11:32AM

Re: [ASK] Good Directive vs Bad Directives

antituhan April 30, 2012 05:28PM

Re: Good Directive vs Bad Directives

Francis Daly May 01, 2012 01:44PM

Re: Good Directive vs Bad Directives

antituhan May 01, 2012 09:36PM

Re: Good Directive vs Bad Directives

Cliff Wells May 01, 2012 09:48PM

Re: Good Directive vs Bad Directives

Francis Daly May 02, 2012 07:40AM

Re: Good Directive vs Bad Directives

antituhan May 03, 2012 09:06AM

Re: Good Directive vs Bad Directives

Francis Daly May 03, 2012 06:28PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 294
Record Number of Users: 8 on April 13, 2023
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready