Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Reading from a named pipe / fifo (final version)

Brian Akins
January 21, 2012 09:28PM
On Jan 21, 2012, at 9:04 PM, Max wrote:
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, but using FastCGI is not an option for
> many reasons. The most elegant solution I could come up with
> without hacking nginx involves embedded Perl like this:

Won't embedded perl block in this case? I'm not as familiar with it. If it does, this seems like a sub-optimal solution. FastCGI would not block on the nginx side. It's pretty trivial to manage fastcgi processes.

It doesn't have to be fastcgi, it could be a min-http server uwsgi or whatever or is there some restriction that nginx must talk directly to the fifo?


_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Subject Author Posted

Reading from a named pipe / fifo

Max January 20, 2012 04:38PM

Re: Reading from a named pipe / fifo

Brian Akins January 20, 2012 05:22PM

Re[2]: Reading from a named pipe / fifo

Max January 21, 2012 11:30AM

Re: Re[2]: Reading from a named pipe / fifo

takigama January 21, 2012 12:40PM

Re[4]: Reading from a named pipe / fifo

Max January 21, 2012 08:56PM

Re[4]: Reading from a named pipe / fifo (corrected)

Max January 21, 2012 08:58PM

Re[4]: Reading from a named pipe / fifo (final version)

Max January 21, 2012 09:06PM

Re: Reading from a named pipe / fifo (final version)

Brian Akins January 21, 2012 09:28PM

Re[2]: Reading from a named pipe / fifo (final version)

Max January 21, 2012 10:38PM

Re: Reading from a named pipe / fifo (final version)

Brian Akins January 22, 2012 03:52PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 137
Record Number of Users: 8 on April 13, 2023
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready