Maxim Dounin
September 30, 2011 06:00AM

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:11:53AM +0300, Yaniv Aknin wrote:

> In a recent thread on the uwsgi mailing list[1], I began suspecting that
> nginx will not honor an upstream's Content-Length header. i.e., if an
> upstream mentions a Content-Length of 1,000 bytes, but the connection is
> broken after 500 bytes, nginx will still happily serve this entity with a
> 200 OK status.

Status code 200 is irrelevant - as it's generally not possible to
know if connection will be broken in advance (i.e. before sending

> This may be a known bug in nginx, I wanted to be certain I indeed understand
> it correctly and raise the attention to it on the nginx mailing list -
> because I think this is a very serious bug with potentially disastrous
> consequences, as I describe below.
> I was able to confirm this both for uwsgi_pass and proxy_pass; if the
> upstream sets a Content-Length and then breaks the connection before that
> length was achieved, nginx will pass this onwards to the client.
> Furthermore, since the upstream protocol is HTTP 1.0 but the nginx-client
> protocl is HTTP 1.1 (with keepalive), the request will simply not terminate,
> because the client can't tell that the server has nothing more to send and
> nginx will not break the connection, despite the fact its connection with
> the upstream was broken and there's no chance this request will ever be
> fulfilled.
> Things get far worse with gzip compression on - nginx will remove the
> Content-Length header sent by the client and replace it with chunked
> encoding - /incorrect chunked encoding/, that will make the client believe
> it has the full entity, even though it has only a part of this.

Yes, this is a known problem. Upstream module expects backend to
behave properly, and if it misbehaves (or, more importantly,
connection is broken for some reason) bad things may happen.

Upstream's module code needs carefull auditing to fix this. It's
somewhere in my TODO (though not very high).

Maxim Dounin

nginx mailing list
Subject Author Posted

nginx and upstream Content-Length

Yaniv Aknin September 30, 2011 04:12AM

Re: nginx and upstream Content-Length

Maxim Dounin September 30, 2011 06:00AM

Re: nginx and upstream Content-Length

Yaniv Aknin September 30, 2011 10:38AM

Re: nginx and upstream Content-Length

Thomas Love September 30, 2011 11:10AM

Re: nginx and upstream Content-Length

Yaniv Aknin September 30, 2011 12:08PM

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 93
Record Number of Users: 6 on February 13, 2018
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready