I already tried this

Here's the config

fastcgi_cache_path /data/nginx/cache levels=1:2 keys_zone=one:10m
inactive=7d max_size=200m;
fastcgi_temp_path /data/nginx/temp;

location @joomla {
fastcgi_pass 127.0.0.1:9000;
fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME /home/kompastv/web/index.php;
fastcgi_cache one;
fastcgi_cache_key 127.0.0.1:9000$request_uri;
fastcgi_cache_valid 200 1h;

/data/nginx/cache and /data/nginx/temp is still empty

root 28119 0.0 0.0 13940 496 ? Ss 15:41 0:00 nginx:
master process /etc/nginxnew/sbin/nginx -c /etc/nginx/nginx.conf
nginx 28120 1.3 0.2 17328 4408 ? R 15:41 0:01 nginx:
worker process
nginx 28122 1.6 0.2 17384 4540 ? S 15:41 0:01 nginx:
worker process
nginx 28123 0.0 0.0 14096 800 ? S 15:41 0:00 nginx:
cache manager process

is there somethink i've missed?


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nginx@sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx@sysoev.ru] On Behalf Of Igor
Sysoev
Sent: 21 April 2009 15:32
To: nginx@sysoev.ru
Subject: Re: which one is better?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 03:10:31PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:

> Is there any help page regarding fastcgi_cache? Or it's the same format as
> proxy_cache?

Yes, just s/proxy/fastcgi/.

The single difference is that fastcgi cache requires

fastcgi_cache_key localhost:9000$request_uri;

while proxy_cache may use default one, similar to this:

proxy_cache_key $scheme$proxy_host$uri$is_args$args;


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nginx@sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx@sysoev.ru] On Behalf Of
Igor
> Sysoev
> Sent: 21 April 2009 14:41
> To: nginx@sysoev.ru
> Subject: Re: which one is better?
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 01:20:05PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:
>
> > I still wonder which one is better for performance
> >
> > Pure nginx + php-fpm
> >
> > Or
> >
> > Nginx + apache2 + proxy_cache
> >
> > Anybody knows about this?
>
> Can not say about apache2 vs php-fpm, but you can use fastcgi_cache too.
>
>
> --
> Igor Sysoev
> http://sysoev.ru/en/
>

--
Igor Sysoev
http://sysoev.ru/en/