Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: which one is better?

April 21, 2009 04:53AM
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 03:44:28PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:

> I already tried this
>
> Here's the config
>
> fastcgi_cache_path /data/nginx/cache levels=1:2 keys_zone=one:10m
> inactive=7d max_size=200m;
> fastcgi_temp_path /data/nginx/temp;
>
> location @joomla {
> fastcgi_pass 127.0.0.1:9000;
> fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME /home/kompastv/web/index.php;
> fastcgi_cache one;
> fastcgi_cache_key 127.0.0.1:9000$request_uri;
> fastcgi_cache_valid 200 1h;
>
> /data/nginx/cache and /data/nginx/temp is still empty
>
> root 28119 0.0 0.0 13940 496 ? Ss 15:41 0:00 nginx:
> master process /etc/nginxnew/sbin/nginx -c /etc/nginx/nginx.conf
> nginx 28120 1.3 0.2 17328 4408 ? R 15:41 0:01 nginx:
> worker process
> nginx 28122 1.6 0.2 17384 4540 ? S 15:41 0:01 nginx:
> worker process
> nginx 28123 0.0 0.0 14096 800 ? S 15:41 0:00 nginx:
> cache manager process
>
> is there somethink i've missed?

Does fastcgi return Expires or Cache-Control headers which may forbid caching ?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nginx@sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx@sysoev.ru] On Behalf Of Igor
> Sysoev
> Sent: 21 April 2009 15:32
> To: nginx@sysoev.ru
> Subject: Re: which one is better?
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 03:10:31PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:
>
> > Is there any help page regarding fastcgi_cache? Or it's the same format as
> > proxy_cache?
>
> Yes, just s/proxy/fastcgi/.
>
> The single difference is that fastcgi cache requires
>
> fastcgi_cache_key localhost:9000$request_uri;
>
> while proxy_cache may use default one, similar to this:
>
> proxy_cache_key $scheme$proxy_host$uri$is_args$args;
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-nginx@sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx@sysoev.ru] On Behalf Of
> Igor
> > Sysoev
> > Sent: 21 April 2009 14:41
> > To: nginx@sysoev.ru
> > Subject: Re: which one is better?
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 01:20:05PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:
> >
> > > I still wonder which one is better for performance
> > >
> > > Pure nginx + php-fpm
> > >
> > > Or
> > >
> > > Nginx + apache2 + proxy_cache
> > >
> > > Anybody knows about this?
> >
> > Can not say about apache2 vs php-fpm, but you can use fastcgi_cache too.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Igor Sysoev
> > http://sysoev.ru/en/
> >
>
> --
> Igor Sysoev
> http://sysoev.ru/en/
>

--
Igor Sysoev
http://sysoev.ru/en/
Subject Author Posted

Re: which one is better?

Igor Sysoev April 21, 2009 04:53AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 296
Record Number of Users: 8 on April 13, 2023
Record Number of Guests: 421 on December 02, 2018
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MariaDB      ipv6 ready