On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:55 PM, momyc <nginx-forum@nginx.us> wrote:

> You clearly... err.
>

​Hmmm?​

>
> > 32K simultaneous active connections to the same service on a single
> machine? I suspect the bottleneck is somewhere else...
>
> I don't know what exactly "service" means in context of our conversation
> but
> if that means server then I did not say that everything should be handled
> by
> single FastCGI server. I said single Nginx server can easily dispatch
> thousands of HTTP requests to a number of remote FastCGI backends.
>

​... and I haven't seen a clue indicating that multiplexing would be as
useful in practice as​

​it is claimed to be in theory.​

>
> > I am no among the developers at all
>
> That's what I thought.
>

​Well. You must be an expert on the matter. I'll probably be enlightened
reading whatever follows.​
​..​
​ :o)​

Developer omniscience? ​I am done here.​
---
*B. R.*
_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx